On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 4:20 AM, Christophe Gisquet
<[email protected]> wrote:
> 2012/2/24 Christophe Gisquet <[email protected]>:
>> this 19KB memcpy seems superfluous compared to swapping an index.
>> Unless I'm missing something. This is more a patch to demonstrate the
>> way, as I'm quite unsure of where to initialize said index, when to
>> reset it, etc.
>>
>> Christophe
>
> ping?
>
> (note: it's not only cosmetical, I measured gains of up to 2% with that patch)

LGTM

For future readability someone may want to rename Y1 and Y0 to
Y_current and Y_old or similar or not.
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to