Hi,

On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Alex Converse <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Alex Converse <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 4:20 AM, Christophe Gisquet
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 2012/2/24 Christophe Gisquet <[email protected]>:
>>>> this 19KB memcpy seems superfluous compared to swapping an index.
>>>> Unless I'm missing something. This is more a patch to demonstrate the
>>>> way, as I'm quite unsure of where to initialize said index, when to
>>>> reset it, etc.
>>>>
>>>> Christophe
>>>
>>> ping?
>>>
>>> (note: it's not only cosmetical, I measured gains of up to 2% with that 
>>> patch)
>>
>> LGTM
>>
>> For future readability someone may want to rename Y1 and Y0 to
>> Y_current and Y_old or similar or not.
>
> Actually this is a little bit more complicated than it needs to be.

Alex, can you finish this?

Ronald
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to