On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Kostya Shishkov <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:37:22PM -0800, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Kostya Shishkov >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > ProRes codes chroma blocks in 444 mode in different order than luma block, >> > so make both decoder and encoder read/write chroma blocks in right order. >> > >> > Reported by Phil Barrett >> > --- >> > libavcodec/proresdec.c | 41 >> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- >> > libavcodec/proresenc.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ >> > tests/ref/fate/prores-alpha | 4 ++-- >> > 3 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) >> [..] >> > diff --git a/tests/ref/fate/prores-alpha b/tests/ref/fate/prores-alpha >> > index 9aa9160..80442fe 100644 >> > --- a/tests/ref/fate/prores-alpha >> > +++ b/tests/ref/fate/prores-alpha >> > @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ >> > #tb 0: 1/2997 >> > -0, 0, 0, 0, 12441600, 0x9d3dc525 >> > -0, 100, 100, 0, 12441600, 0x9d3dc525 >> > +0, 0, 0, 0, 12441600, 0x254d8f95 >> > +0, 100, 100, 0, 12441600, 0x254d8f95 >> >> So is this correct? I.e. can you see improvements in the video output? > > Of course - now output image looks correct, before it had coloured saw-edges > on borders between areas.
Verified. LGTM. _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
