On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:23:21AM -0800, Alex Converse wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Kostya Shishkov
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:37:22PM -0800, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Kostya Shishkov
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > ProRes codes chroma blocks in 444 mode in different order than luma 
> >> > block,
> >> > so make both decoder and encoder read/write chroma blocks in right order.
> >> >
> >> > Reported by Phil Barrett
> >> > ---
> >> >  libavcodec/proresdec.c      |   41 
> >> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> >> >  libavcodec/proresenc.c      |   37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> >> >  tests/ref/fate/prores-alpha |    4 ++--
> >> >  3 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> >> [..]
> >> > diff --git a/tests/ref/fate/prores-alpha b/tests/ref/fate/prores-alpha
> >> > index 9aa9160..80442fe 100644
> >> > --- a/tests/ref/fate/prores-alpha
> >> > +++ b/tests/ref/fate/prores-alpha
> >> > @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
> >> >  #tb 0: 1/2997
> >> > -0,          0,          0,        0, 12441600, 0x9d3dc525
> >> > -0,        100,        100,        0, 12441600, 0x9d3dc525
> >> > +0,          0,          0,        0, 12441600, 0x254d8f95
> >> > +0,        100,        100,        0, 12441600, 0x254d8f95
> >>
> >> So is this correct? I.e. can you see improvements in the video output?
> >
> > Of course - now output image looks correct, before it had coloured saw-edges
> > on borders between areas.
> 
> Verified.
> 
> LGTM.

applied them all
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to