"Ronald S. Bultje" <rsbul...@gmail.com> writes: > Hi, > > On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Måns Rullgård <m...@mansr.com> wrote: >> "Ronald S. Bultje" <rsbul...@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Derek Buitenhuis >>> <derek.buitenh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On 07/07/2012 6:09 PM, Diego Biurrun wrote: >>>>> And this is required - why? >>>> >>>> Libm / math is not A Thing in MSVC and isn't required. >>>> >>>> It complains about -lm, but ignores it. >>>> >>>> I think this is mostly to shut up a warning. >>> >>> Correct. First, link.exe does not use -l<libname> to link in >>> libraries, it uses lib<name>.lib (similar to how gcc allows you to >>> specify the full filename of a lib<name>.a static library). Second, >>> there is no math lib necessary at all. >> >> This is the wrong fix for that problem. The correct fix is to translate >> -lfoo to the supported syntax. This is required anyway, and once done >> the original test will work exactly as intended. > > Wrong thread. Please comment only on the -lm piece which isn't > necessary in this thread.
I fail to parse that sentence. -- Måns Rullgård m...@mansr.com _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
