On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 7:55 AM, Luca Barbato <lu_z...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On 07/09/2012 04:35 PM, Derek Buitenhuis wrote: >> On 09/07/2012 6:17 AM, Måns Rullgård wrote: >>> I don't like this one bit. It makes the code considerably more >>> complicated only to allow running two minor tests on an obscure >>> platform. >>> >>> Just make the tests conditional.
It's a very important test for diagnosing issues that manifest in the AAC and Vorbis decoders. >> >> -1 >> >> I'd hardly call one of the most (if not the most) widely used >> platforms for Libav "obscure". Not OK with making FFT testing >> conditional. I agree with Derek. > > The supported platform for windows is and will be mingw. > And MSVC will be supported too soon, or should we go ahead and revert all the MSVC patches that have been applied so far? > I don't know how you think that giving some kind of support for an > utterly broken compiler makes it not an obscure platform. > Why does the "brokenness" of the compiler make it "obscure"? It is one of the most popular and well known compilers out there. ob·scure adj \äb-ˈskyu̇r, əb-\ Definition of OBSCURE 1 a : dark, dim b : shrouded in or hidden by darkness c : not clearly seen or easily distinguished : faint <obscure markings> 2 : not readily understood or clearly expressed; also : mysterious 3 : relatively unknown: as a : remote, secluded <an obscure village> b : not prominent or famous <an obscure poet> 4 : constituting the unstressed vowel \ə\ or having unstressed \ə\ as its value - ob·scure·ly adverb - ob·scure·ness noun > That said, since it is an obscure platform having the best test coverage > could be nice. > --Alex _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
