Hi, On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Ronald S. Bultje <rsbul...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Daniel Kang <daniel.d.k...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Diego Biurrun <di...@biurrun.de> wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 05:12:23PM -0700, Daniel Kang wrote: >>> > From: Daniel Kang <daniel.d.k...@gmail.com> >>> > >>> > The only CPUs that have 3dnow and don't have mmxext are 12 years old. >>> > --- >>> > libavcodec/x86/dsputil_mmx.c | 9 --------- >>> > libavcodec/x86/h264_qpel_mmx.c | 4 ---- >>> > 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) >>> >>> What sort of maintenance burden does this relieve us from? >>> I'm writing this mail on a system fitting the description >>> you mention, my trusty old K6-III. >> >> > [..] >> 4. You can probably decode 260p H.264 with a K6-III. Who seriously would use >> this? > > This really is the killer. Is there any sort of reasonable expectation > that a k6-3 can get useful work done when it comes to H264 decoding? I > wouldn't even mind dropping all MMX optimizations (where MMX2 - i.e. > SSE - or higher exists) altogether, i.e. going the H264 way
.. x264 way. :). Ronald _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
