On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 07:36:09AM -0700, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 6:24 AM, Diego Biurrun <di...@biurrun.de> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 02:46:36PM +0200, Janne Grunau wrote: > >> On 2012-08-01 01:33:47 +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote: > >> > On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 12:00:58AM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote: > >> > > "Ronald S. Bultje" <rsbul...@gmail.com> writes: > >> > > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Diego Biurrun <di...@biurrun.de> > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > [..] > >> > > > > >> > > > The most important thing is missing: why? > >> > > > >> > > mmxext is a somewhat more official name. > >> > > >> > Yes, see my introductory email for the series. I had to unify in one > >> > direction or the other, so I picked the one that appeared more > >> > sensible, i.e. the more official names. > >> > >> That's all well but it is still missing from the commit message. That's > >> how I uderstood Ronald comment. Please amend the commit. > > > > How about: > > > > x86: build: replace mmx2 by mmxext > > > > Refactoring mmx2/mmxext YASM code with cpuflags will force renames. > > So switching to a consistent naming scheme beforehand in sensible. > > in sensible?
Fixed locally. Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
