On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 09:59:54PM -0700, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Diego Biurrun <di...@biurrun.de> wrote:
> > Refactoring mmx2/mmxext YASM code with cpuflags will force renames.
> > So switching to a consistent naming scheme beforehand is sensible.
> > The name "mmxext" is more official and widespread and also the name
> > of the CPU flag, as reported e.g. by the Linux kernel.
> 
> I have to be honest, I really don't care much for the name of the
> beast, but fine, if this is what people prefer, we can go with it.
> 
> Please document it in APIChanges (AV_CPU_FLAG_MMX2 -> MMXEXT), then OK to 
> apply.

I added the following to APIChanges locally:

  2012-08-03 - xxxxxxx - lavu 54.13.0 - cpu.h
                         lsws 2.1.1   - swscale.h
    Rename AV_CPU_FLAG_MMX2  ---> AV_CPU_FLAG_MMXEXT.
    Rename SWS_CPU_CAPS_MMX2 ---> SWS_CPU_CAPS_MMXEXT.

Does your OK extend to the whole set of mmx2 --> mmxext renames?
And do you guys prefer me to squash those patches into one?

Diego
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
libav-devel@libav.org
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to