Diego Biurrun <di...@biurrun.de> writes:

> On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 03:30:17PM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>> Diego Biurrun <di...@biurrun.de> writes:
>> > On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 02:04:27PM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>> >> Diego Biurrun <di...@biurrun.de> writes:
>> >> > --- a/libavutil/x86/cpu.c
>> >> > +++ b/libavutil/x86/cpu.c
>> >> > @@ -96,15 +113,7 @@ int ff_get_cpu_flags_x86(void)
>> >> >
>> >> >  #if ARCH_X86_32
>> >> > -    x86_reg a, c;
>> >> > -
>> >> > -    /* Check if CPUID is supported by attempting to toggle the ID bit 
>> >> > in
>> >> > -     * the EFLAGS register. */
>> >> > -    get_eflags(a);
>> >> > -    set_eflags(a ^ 0x200000);
>> >> > -    get_eflags(c);
>> >> > -
>> >> > -    if (a == c)
>> >> > +    if (!have_cpuid())
>> >> >          return 0; /* CPUID not supported */
>> >> >  #endif
>> >> 
>> >> You could "#define have_cpuid() 1" for x86_64 and get rid of this #if.
>> >
>> > But I rely on have_cpuid to mean that I have either yasm or inline asm
>> > available in 5/5.
>> 
>> I thought you tested for "cpuid" there.
>
> No.

Why not?

-- 
Måns Rullgård
m...@mansr.com
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
libav-devel@libav.org
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to