Diego Biurrun <di...@biurrun.de> writes: > On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 03:48:39PM +0300, Martin Storsjö wrote: >> On Thu, 4 Oct 2012, Diego Biurrun wrote: >> >The table is so small that the space gain is not worth the >> >performance overhead of cross-library access. >> >--- >> > >> >Now with each duplicated table in a separate file. >> > >> >libavcodec/Makefile | 1 + >> >libavcodec/log2_tab.c | 1 + >> >libavutil/Makefile | 1 + >> >libavutil/log2_tab.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> >libavutil/mathematics.c | 11 ----------- >> >5 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) >> >create mode 100644 libavcodec/log2_tab.c >> >create mode 100644 libavutil/log2_tab.c >> >> This is used in libavformat as well, so that one also needs a copy, >> if this is the way to go. > > Alternatively, we could make the table public.
What good would that possibly do? I thought we were trying to get rid of exported data symbols. -- Måns Rullgård m...@mansr.com _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
