On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:22:00AM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote: > Diego Biurrun <di...@biurrun.de> writes: > > On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 03:48:39PM +0300, Martin Storsjö wrote: > >> On Thu, 4 Oct 2012, Diego Biurrun wrote: > >> >The table is so small that the space gain is not worth the > >> >performance overhead of cross-library access. > >> >--- > >> > > >> >Now with each duplicated table in a separate file. > >> > > >> >libavcodec/Makefile | 1 + > >> >libavcodec/log2_tab.c | 1 + > >> >libavutil/Makefile | 1 + > >> >libavutil/log2_tab.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> >libavutil/mathematics.c | 11 ----------- > >> >5 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > >> >create mode 100644 libavcodec/log2_tab.c > >> >create mode 100644 libavutil/log2_tab.c > >> > >> This is used in libavformat as well, so that one also needs a copy, > >> if this is the way to go. > > > > Alternatively, we could make the table public. > > What good would that possibly do? I thought we were trying to get rid > of exported data symbols.
I thought we were trying to get rid of semi-private and private symbols shared across libraries... Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
