On 26 July 2013 06:46, Rémi Denis-Courmont <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 15:33:10 +0200, wm4 <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:36:47 +0200 > > Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > >> Looks wrong in many ways. We can do w/out it IMHO. > > > > It does seem to be valid C, though. More valid than av_freep() or > > av_reallocp(). > > It is valid C99, yes. That said, it will pointless zero-initialize the > buffer. So while it is convenient for the programmer to use, it is not > really ideal.
Since the consensus seems to be against this patch, I'll drop it. _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
