On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote: > On 02/11/13 12:15, Diego Biurrun wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 01:09:25AM +0200, Martin Storsjö wrote: >>> The maybe-uninitialized check still needs to be moved back into a >>> gcc specific block, since this now spews warnings with clang: >>> https://fate.libav.org/x86_64-linux-clang >> >> Wait, clang groks -Wmaybe-uninitialized, but not -Wno-maybe-uninitialized? >> WTF? >> > > clang swallows everything and burps a lot, there is a -Wno- option to > make it do that quietly.
That's -Wno-unknown-warning-option but adding it to clang's CFLAGS permanently feels really hackish... Vittorio _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
