On 03/11/13 08:51, Vittorio Giovara wrote: > On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 02/11/13 12:15, Diego Biurrun wrote: >>> On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 01:09:25AM +0200, Martin Storsjö wrote: >>>> The maybe-uninitialized check still needs to be moved back into a >>>> gcc specific block, since this now spews warnings with clang: >>>> https://fate.libav.org/x86_64-linux-clang >>> >>> Wait, clang groks -Wmaybe-uninitialized, but not -Wno-maybe-uninitialized? >>> WTF? >>> >> >> clang swallows everything and burps a lot, there is a -Wno- option to >> make it do that quietly. > > > That's -Wno-unknown-warning-option but adding it to clang's CFLAGS > permanently feels really hackish... > Vittorio
We have the extra warnings variable for that. lu _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
