On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:45:20AM +0100, Tim W. wrote:
> On 19 Nov 2013, at 01:15, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 12:41:47PM +0100, Tim Walker wrote:
> >> --- a/libavcodec/ac3dec.c
> >> +++ b/libavcodec/ac3dec.c
> >> @@ -178,9 +178,8 @@ static av_cold int ac3_decode_init(AVCodecContext 
> >> *avctx)
> >> 
> >>     /* allow downmixing to stereo or mono */
> >> -    if (avctx->channels > 0 && avctx->request_channels > 0 &&
> >> -            avctx->request_channels < avctx->channels &&
> >> -            avctx->request_channels <= 2) {
> >> +    if (avctx->request_channels > 0 && avctx->request_channels <= 2 &&
> >> +        avctx->request_channels < avctx->channels) {
> >>         avctx->channels = avctx->request_channels;
> > 
> > what ensures that avctx->channels is non-negative?  (Yes, I wonder why
> > that struct member is signed in the first place.)
> > 
> > Diego
> 
> (avctx->request_channels > 0 && avctx->request_channels < avctx->channels) 
> implies (avctx->channels > 0) or false (so the result is unchanged).
> 
> Would:
> 
> >>     if (avctx->request_channels > 0 && avctx->request_channels <= 2 &&
> >>         avctx->channels > avctx->request_channels) {
> 
> 
> Be clearer?

Never mind, I somehow misread the expression; queueing the patch.

Diego
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to