On Thu, 21 Nov 2013 17:42:24 +0100, "Tim W." <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On 21 Nov 2013, at 14:30, Anton Khirnov <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > On Mon, 18 Nov 2013 12:41:44 +0100, Tim Walker <[email protected]> 
> > wrote:
> >> ---
> >> libavcodec/dcadec.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
> >> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/libavcodec/dcadec.c b/libavcodec/dcadec.c
> >> index 7af5e5c..8835133 100644
> >> --- a/libavcodec/dcadec.c
> >> +++ b/libavcodec/dcadec.c
> >> @@ -1288,7 +1288,8 @@ static int dca_filter_channels(DCAContext *s, int 
> >> block_index)
> >>     }
> >> 
> >>     /* Down mixing */
> >> -    if (s->avctx->request_channels == 2 && s->prim_channels > 2) {
> >> +    if (s->prim_channels > 2 &&
> >> +        s->avctx->request_channel_layout == AV_CH_LAYOUT_STEREO) {
> >>         dca_downmix(s->samples_chanptr, s->amode, s->downmix_coef, 
> >> s->channel_order_tab);
> >>     }
> >> 
> >> @@ -1803,8 +1804,11 @@ static int dca_decode_frame(AVCodecContext *avctx, 
> >> void *data,
> >>     if (s->amode < 16) {
> >>         avctx->channel_layout = dca_core_channel_layout[s->amode];
> >> 
> >> -        if (s->xch_present && (!avctx->request_channels ||
> >> -                               avctx->request_channels > 
> >> num_core_channels + !!s->lfe)) {
> >> +        if (s->xch_present &&
> >> +            (!avctx->request_channels ||
> >> +             avctx->request_channels > num_core_channels + !!s->lfe) &&
> >> +            (!avctx->request_channel_layout ||
> >> +             avctx->request_channel_layout & AV_CH_BACK_CENTER)) {
> > 
> > I'm a bit confused by this part.
> > If we're only handling request_channel_layout == stereo
> > (and temporarily request_channels == 2, which is converted to
> > request_channel_layout in init), why are you checking request_channels here?
> 
> No, the DCA decoder also handles disabling XCh via request_channels, by 
> checking whether (request_channels < num_core_channels + lfe + xch).
> 
> Not sure how to properly handle that, short of hardcoding the layout for 
> request_channels == 5 (-> 5.0) or == 6 (-> 5.1) or checking request_channels 
> as I do above.
> 

I think hardcoding the layouts is acceptable.
request_channels will be removed at next bump anyway.

-- 
Anton Khirnov
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to