On 11 Feb 2014, at 12:34, Anton Khirnov <[email protected]> wrote:
> ping2
I thought this was superseded by:
Work around a broken gcc/limits.h combination on 32bit {Net, Open}BSD.
…which is also marked as superseded on Patchwork. Last reply to that second
patch was:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 09:57:50PM -0800, Diego Biurrun wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 09:59:52PM -0800, Martynas Venckus wrote:
>>>> compat/bsd/limits.h | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> configure | 2 ++
>>>> 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+)
>>>> create mode 100644 compat/bsd/limits.h
>>>
>>> Whoa, instead of patching things around, can we do this right and fix it
>>> upstream? It's not like the upstream is uncooperative.
>>
>> Wait, what?
>>
>> You mean that after years of fending of BSD "porters" that ran around
>> and patched every single application that used some unavailable standard
>> feature instead of patching their libc/whatever once, you turn the tables
>> on us and display righteous anger when we think about adding a local hack
>> for a BSD instead of fixing things at the source?
>>
>> I am positively delighted. Hats off, dude!
>
>
> Note: There was no sarcasm involved here. I am absolutely, positively
> delighted that you step forward and proactively try to fix the issue at
> the root.
>
> Diego
Tim
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
