On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Vittorio Giovara <vittorio.giov...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Derek Buitenhuis > <derek.buitenh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 11/27/2014 6:12 PM, James Almer wrote: >>>>> Isn't it cleaner to just upload lena to the fate suit instead of having to >>>>> update the reference files for all the relevant tests? >>>> >>>> How is that cleaner than replacing non-redistributable files with a >>>> perfectly free one? >> >> I said it over at FFmpeg when the Debian insanity reach them, and I'll >> say it here too: Removing THE STANDARD test image, used ONLY in regression >> testing because it doesn't meet an arbitrary *binary* distro's "free" >> guidelines, is a load of crap. I would tell the Freedom Enforcement Squad >> to kindly go forth and procreate. But that's me. > > General question, is lena.ppm's author known? If so has anyone tried > to reach him or her out and see if a more liberal license could be > agreed upon?
see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Lenna.png#Licensing Good luck with contacting the Playboy! Reinhard -- regards, Reinhard _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
