On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Sean McGovern <gsean...@gmail.com> wrote: > I definitely have no intention to support old (> 2 years) trees. If someone > wants to step up to the plate, go ahead.
I am all for dropping 0.8, but there might still be need of additional point releases. Just drop the 'final' clause > With our new release schedule, maintaining more than 3-4 trees is ultimately > untenable. We don't have the resources. > > When release/12 comes out, we'll have rels 9 through 12 to support, plus HEAD. That's why I was suggesting to call 'final' release 10. Since 11 is 100% compatibile, we can invite downstream users to update to 11 instead. Opinions from the crowd? -- Vittorio _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
