On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Vittorio Giovara <vittorio.giov...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Sean McGovern <gsean...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I definitely have no intention to support old (> 2 years) trees. If someone >> wants to step up to the plate, go ahead. > > I am all for dropping 0.8, but there might still be need of additional > point releases. Just drop the 'final' clause > >> With our new release schedule, maintaining more than 3-4 trees is ultimately >> untenable. We don't have the resources. >> >> When release/12 comes out, we'll have rels 9 through 12 to support, plus >> HEAD. > > That's why I was suggesting to call 'final' release 10. Since 11 is > 100% compatibile, we can invite downstream users to update to 11 > instead. > > Opinions from the crowd?
Ping. No objections? -- Vittorio _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
