On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Steve Lhomme <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Steve Lhomme <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> From: Steve Lhomme <rob...@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Otherwise some ARM and other unsupported CPU/OS is linked with -O0
>>> ---
>>> configure | 1 +
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/configure b/configure
>>> index 6d809f7..251b7c4 100755
>>> --- a/configure
>>> +++ b/configure
>>> @@ -3278,6 +3278,7 @@ probe_cc(){
>>> _DEPFLAGS='$(CPPFLAGS) $(CFLAGS) -showIncludes -Zs'
>>> _cflags_speed="-O2"
>>> _cflags_size="-O1"
>>> + _cflags_noopt="-O1"
>>
>> noopt should only be used with --disable-optimizations, why are you
>> building with that if thats not what you actually want?
>
> That's what I used indeed. But it didn't link because it would try to
> use all kinds of stuff that are compiled but to be dropped by the
> linker. If you have another suggestion for this not to happen...
>
Should -O0 be used for noopt?
--
Vittorio
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
libav-devel@libav.org
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
