On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Diego Biurrun <di...@biurrun.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 04:23:02PM +0100, Steve Lhomme wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Steve Lhomme <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> From: Steve Lhomme <rob...@gmail.com>
>> >>
>> >> Otherwise some ARM and other unsupported CPU/OS is linked with -O0
>> >> --- a/configure
>> >> +++ b/configure
>> >> @@ -3278,6 +3278,7 @@ probe_cc(){
>> >>          _DEPFLAGS='$(CPPFLAGS) $(CFLAGS) -showIncludes -Zs'
>> >>          _cflags_speed="-O2"
>> >>          _cflags_size="-O1"
>> >> +        _cflags_noopt="-O1"
>> >
>> > noopt should only be used with --disable-optimizations, why are you
>> > building with that if thats not what you actually want?
>>
>> That's what I used indeed. But it didn't link because it would try to
>> use all kinds of stuff that are compiled but to be dropped by the
>> linker. If you have another suggestion for this not to happen...
>
> You mean DCE (dead code elimination) does not work? We do indeed
> require DCE to build..

That's the thing, yes. It doesn't work with -O0.

> Diego
> _______________________________________________
> libav-devel mailing list
> libav-devel@libav.org
> https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
libav-devel@libav.org
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to