On 5 February 2012 18:42, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceho...@ag.or.at> wrote:
> Carl Eugen Hoyos <cehoyos@...> writes: > > > The list contains all things you have to do afaict, > > and some things that really make a lot of sense if you trying > > to fulfil the requirements of the LGPL (as opposed to trying > > very hard not to fulfil its concept and getting away with it). > > [About http://ffmpeg.org/legal.html ] > I just saw that above is of course not true for point 2 > (use dynamic linking) but since using static linking makes > conforming to the LGPL more difficult I think it clearly > counts as good advice. > > That page includes "distribute the ffmpeg source code". IIRC that's *not* a requirement for LGPL? There is no hidden insult, I am simply remarking a legal page should clearly differentiate between what is a legal requirement from the license, and what is considered polite. If we start adding what we *want* to what is mandatory, we end up confusing people.
_______________________________________________ Libav-user mailing list Libav-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-user
