On Feb 27, 2013, at 00:15, Nicolas George wrote: > L'octidi 8 ventôse, an CCXXI, "René J.V. Bertin" a écrit : >> Other than using memcpy or memmove? ;) > > You still have to compute the pointers you give to memcpy/memmove
Assuming that's the case, then > correct phrasing would be: *including* using memcpy or memmove. yes, indeed. It's always annoyed me that a generic address type cannot represent things like "the Nth next address" ... R _______________________________________________ Libav-user mailing list Libav-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-user