On Feb 27, 2013, at 00:15, Nicolas George wrote:

> L'octidi 8 ventôse, an CCXXI, "René J.V. Bertin" a écrit :
>> Other than using memcpy or memmove? ;)
> 
> You still have to compute the pointers you give to memcpy/memmove

Assuming that's the case, then

> correct phrasing would be: *including* using memcpy or memmove.

yes, indeed.

It's always annoyed me that a generic address type cannot represent things like 
"the Nth next address" ...

R
_______________________________________________
Libav-user mailing list
Libav-user@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-user

Reply via email to