On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Luca Abeni <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 23/12/09 20:32, Eugene Mymrin wrote: > >> I'm building an application for Android which uses FFmpeg to decode >> audio streams. >> Android 1.5 has a problem which makes it impossible to load >> third-party library with dependencies (1.6 and newer don't have this >> problem). This means I can't use libavformat library because it needs >> libavutil and libavcodec. Linking with FFmpeg statically could be a >> solution but I can't do that because my application is neither GPL not >> LGPL. >> > Note that linking statically or dynamically does not change anything > regarding the licensing issues... > > > Another option is to create single library containing >> functionality of all three libraries - avutil, avcodec, avformat. So >> my question is: is it legal to build single dynamic library, name it >> FFmpeg and then use it in my application? >> > I do not know what you mean by "legal", but this is surely not a way to > address licensing issues. > > He is not trying to address licensing issue, he is trying to get around > Android not allowing more than one library while staying legal, how hard is > that? > > Luca > > _______________________________________________ > libav-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/libav-user > _______________________________________________ libav-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/libav-user
