On Jan 11, 2011, at 1:54 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
> One question not posed is the module name.
>
> ie, should it all be inside libcloud.storage?
>
> This would imply moving all our existing code to libcloud.compute,
> which is kinda a pain for upgrades, but I'm kinda a fan of maybe doing
> it for 0.5, but having the old imports work too for a few versions.
I think we should somehow issue some deprecation warnings of just straight up
libcloud.* and then introduce libcloud.{compute,storage}.
The next version is definitely looking like 0.5.
I'm excited!
> Thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Paul
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Tomaz Muraus <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I have posted a short proposal / ideas for the object storage API on the
>> libcloud wiki - http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/LibcloudStorageAPI
>>
>> Please post your feedback, opinions and ideas how to improve it.
>>
>> I think the next step after deciding how the API should look like (at least
>> approximately) should be
>> implementing the base API and creating a reference driver and then we can
>> move on from there :-)
>>
>> - Tomaz
>>
