Yeah, trying to still keep the old imports to work and just throwing a DeprecationWarning in the next few versions sounds ok.
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Paul Querna <[email protected]> wrote: > One question not posed is the module name. > > ie, should it all be inside libcloud.storage? > > This would imply moving all our existing code to libcloud.compute, > which is kinda a pain for upgrades, but I'm kinda a fan of maybe doing > it for 0.5, but having the old imports work too for a few versions. > > Thoughts? > > Thanks, > > Paul > > > On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Tomaz Muraus <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > I have posted a short proposal / ideas for the object storage API on the > > libcloud wiki - http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/LibcloudStorageAPI > > > > Please post your feedback, opinions and ideas how to improve it. > > > > I think the next step after deciding how the API should look like (at > least > > approximately) should be > > implementing the base API and creating a reference driver and then we can > > move on from there :-) > > > > - Tomaz > > >
