Hi all, You may have read about the recent outcry by FBI and DEA warning that IPv6 could shield criminals from police as i makes tracing electronic addresses 'more difficult'.
See: http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-57453738-83/fbi-dea-warn-ipv6-could-shield-criminals-from-police/ If this is true, isn't this what we want (i.e., more privacy)? On the other hand, I read somewhere that China was among the first nations to fully deployed IPv6 due to its ability to track traffic as IP addresses would be assigned to people just like national ID numbers are assigned to every individual. Are we supposed to be more concerned or glad that we are slowly moving to IPv6 ? Sincerely, Walid ----------------- Walid Al-Saqaf Founder & Administrator alkasir for mapping and circumventing cyber censorship https://alkasir.com <walid.al-sa...@oru.se>
_______________________________________________ liberationtech mailing list liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu Should you need to change your subscription options, please go to: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech If you would like to receive a daily digest, click "yes" (once you click above) next to "would you like to receive list mail batched in a daily digest?" You will need the user name and password you receive from the list moderator in monthly reminders. You may ask for a reminder here: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech Should you need immediate assistance, please contact the list moderator. Please don't forget to follow us on http://twitter.com/#!/Liberationtech
