Nadim Kobeissi <na...@nadim.cc> writes: > Hasn't Retroshare also been under criticism for a lack of audit?
I've always wondered why something like Mega gets a lot of attention and people audit it pretty much immediately, but something like Retroshare, which has been around for a while never has the eye of Sauron pass over it. So, to those of you who immediately tore Mega apart when it was launched, I ask you... why did you swarm over the latest new thing that nobody has even used, but haven't touched something like Retroshare (or even more core componants that we depend on)? Why does something like Mega get all the attention of "crypto researchers", but nobody has bothered to look at Retroshare? In any case, lack of audit means only one thing - it should be audited. I wonder why nobody has. micah -- Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
