Michael

Well I feel much better as Australian Citizen living out side of US.

Andrew Clark
andrewrcl...@mac.com



On 07/06/2013, at 10:32 PM, David Golumbia <dgolum...@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 6:52 AM, Michael Rogers <mich...@briarproject.org> 
> wrote:
> "This law does not allow the targeting of any US citizen or of any person 
> located within the United States."
> 
> Note the wording of this denial: the *target* of collection may not be a US 
> citizen or a person located in the US. But if the *target* is, say, Al Qaeda 
> and affiliated organisations, does the law prevent data about US citizens and 
> persons located in the US from being collected and retained?
> 
> Cheers,
> Michael
> 
> 
> And in case one draws any comfort at all from these apparent limitations: 
> there is no chance that intelligence community representatives would take 
> advantage of very technical details of the wording of laws to, e.g., share 
> information on the citizens of other countries with whom it has formal 
> information sharing agreements but whom it is not supposed to directly 
> surveil, right? Because that would be kind of dishonest, and we know the 
> intelligence community is first and foremost dedicated to being truthful in 
> public. 
> 
> http://opencanada.org/features/the-think-tank/essays/canada-and-the-five-eyes-intelligence-community/
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UKUSA_Agreement
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> David Golumbia
> dgolum...@gmail.com
> --
> Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by 
> emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at 
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech

--
Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing 
moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech

Reply via email to