On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Nadim Kobeissi <na...@nadim.cc> wrote: > > "Will it be Open Source? > We have all intentions of opening up the source as much as possible for > scrutiny and help! What we really want people to understand however, is that > Open Source in itself does not guarantee any privacy or safety. It sure helps > with transparency, but technology by itself is not enough. The fundamental > benefits of Heml.is will be the app together with our backend infrastructure, > which is what really makes the system interesting and secure." — > https://heml.is/ > > I'm sort of infamous by now for the fusses I make regarding the importance of > open-sourcing security software. I'm pretty sure people are tired of me so > I'm going to be quiet. But it's clear to me that Hemlis's answer is not the > right answer.
Hi: Agreed. I won't support heml.is if it's not libre software, as it seems to be the case. They want 100k $ to fund non-free software. That's something I don't think people should support. Regards, -- Eduardo Robles Elvira +34 668 824 393 skype: edulix2 http://www.wadobo.com it's not magic, it's wadobo! -- Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
