Right, I didn't explain that well. It would be a botnet of machines which are already part of the cjdns network. Not something we have to worry about today or tomorrow but if it becomes a new defacto standard for the internet, it would be a concern.
Thanks, Caleb On 07/15/2013 07:12 AM, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Caleb James DeLisle > <calebdeli...@lavabit.com> wrote: >> You'd need a botnet to attack the network because then you could have >> nodes spread out over physical space but clustered in keyspace. > > And, presumably, convince people to connect to them. If I understood > correctly? > -- > Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by > emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at > https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech > -- Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
