Presumably, if this type of approach became widely adopted, it would be a useful service for an independent group to monitor the status of these notices and periodically publish a report of which companies had removed their notice.
On 09/09/2013 12:52 PM, Scott Arciszewski wrote: > Forgot the URL: > http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/sep/09/nsa-sabotage-dead-mans-switch > > > On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Scott Arciszewski > <kobrasre...@gmail.com <mailto:kobrasre...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hello, > > I saw this article on The Guardian[1] and it mentioned a librarian > who posted a sign that looked like this: > http://www.librarian.net/pics/antipat4.gif and would remove it if > visited by the FBI. So a naive question comes to mind: If I operated > an internet service, and I posted a thing that says "We have not > received a request to spy on our users. Watch closely for the > removal of this text," what legal risk would be incurred? > > If the answer is "None" or "Very little", what's stopping people > from doing this? > > Thanks, > Scott > > > > -- Dan Staples Open Technology Institute https://commotionwireless.net OpenPGP key: http://disman.tl/pgp.asc Fingerprint: 2480 095D 4B16 436F 35AB 7305 F670 74ED BD86 43A9 -- Liberationtech is a public list whose archives are searchable on Google. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu.
