Oh what fun. Not speaking for the Tor Project, but only speaking for up to 2007, and my own opinions, but I did comment.
And, what I can say is, my opinions *do not* represent the opinions of everyone in the current project, but the public face of the project at inception as a c3 was pretty much shaped, in messaging, by me -- so I can speak regarding that first year and a bit, and the artist's original intent, as it were. And regardless of what neutrality the current project takes, I am an ideologue of sorts, if not a readily cubby-hole-able one by current categorization -- my history shows it, and there's no denying it. I was raised a political animal. And there have been changes no doubt -- not like I'm in daily communication. I will let the current folks speak to that or not. yrs, On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Richard Brooks <r...@acm.org> wrote: > Foreign Policy Magazine claims that US Dept of State > trumps the NSA: > > > http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2013/10/04/not_even_the_nsa_can_crack_the_state_departments_online_anonymity_tool > > > > > -- > Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations > of list guidelines will get you moderated: > https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. > Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at > compa...@stanford.edu. > -- Shava Nerad shav...@gmail.com
-- Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu.