I can't claim that I have the answer (because I don't!) but I'm in favor of civil society launching a bottom-up "grand challenge" to develop what we'd like to see. ("Invent the future") Ultimately it should reach across various boundaries, including national ones. I presented a case for it in my article for ACM Interactions, Creating the World Citizen Parliament, and discussed ideas as to how to get it off the ground. Please note that I'm not calling for a "parliament" that is exactly modeled on existing parliaments! I would expect that various bottom up efforts would result in a type of kluge — much belittled by computer scientists but exemplified by real-world examples of, say, managing the commons. I may be a minority voice here but I can't see any reasonable democracy functioning without aware and active citizens (which is what I call civic intelligence). We are seeing in the U.S. and other places the results of having too many disengaged and uninformed people. And this of course does not constitute an "easy fix." The links you mention on vice.com are indeed problematic — to say the least: "What if everybody voted on everything?", for example. Thanks! — Doug
Douglas Schuler Twitter: @doug_schuler |
-- Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu.
