The JBS "model
<http://www.jbs.org/action/downloads/freedom-campaign-downloads/66-model-federal-health-care-nullification-act-for-state-legislatures/download>"
nullification legislation that is being introduced, with minor
variations, in many state legislatures, has some serious flaws:

1. The legislation contemplates provisions that are not in the Health
Care Bill, which specifically forbids criminal prosecution or levies or
liens to collect the "penalties" for failing to purchase insurance, but
leaves it to the discretion of IRS agents to withhold them from federal
government payments to the person, or take them out of tax payments
first, with a remainder owing that they can claim is not the penalty but
unpaid taxes.

2. It won't work to prosecute IRS agents for tax enforcement. The cases
would just be removed to federal court and dismissed. But it could
trigger federal prosecution of anyone attempting to enforce such a state
statute for interfering with a federal agent.

3. IRS agents can do everything from outside the state and thus outside
state jurisdiction, through private intermediaries like banks.

4. It does not provide for legal or financial support for persons
engaged in civil disobedience in response to the provisions of the state
statute.

A sound approach to nullification is discussed at
http://www.constitution.org/reform/us/tx/nullification/nullcomm.htm and
at
http://constitutionalism.blogspot.com/2010/03/holes-in-health-care-bill.html

These flaws and a better approach will be discussed at the meetup of the
Austin Constitution <http://www.meetup.com/constitution/> group Monday,
April 26, among other topics, such as the Articles of Freedom
<http://articlesoffreedom.us>. Also see http://vimeo.com/album/216277

-- Jon

----------------------------------------------------------
Constitution Society               http://constitution.org
2900 W Anderson Ln C-200-322              Austin, TX 78757
512/299-5001                   jon.rol...@constitution.org
----------------------------------------------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to