--- In LibertarianEnterprise@yahoogroups.com, Wraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> Zack, due to the majoritarian nature of voting, participation is a form
> of delegated initiation. Thus, it could hardly be termed libertarian.
> I'm all too painfully aware of those who make different "lessor evils"
> arguments. But isn't following that approach how we ended up in
> our current sorry state?
>

I certainly agree that that is usually the case.
However, there are times when Voting IS justified.

For example, suppose there is a Referendum on a proposed Law to make
Blasphemy a Crime, or some other new Victimless Crime.  Against whom
would I be Initiating Force by Voting against that Law?

Similarly, it is never wrong to vote for a real libertarian.  He will,
where he is able, reduce the Initiated Force of Government.

In the case of Ron Paul, I admit this is getting dicey.   There are
several things he will do that are UN_Libertarian (notably Immigration
Control).  But he is so much more libertarian than any of his
opponents that I don't see how a vote for him could have a bad result
- that is, the result would not be an increase in Initiation of Force
compared to not voting for him.

When you vote for a candidate who has NO chance of winning (this might
apply to Ron Paul, but it has always applied to LP national
candidates), you are not Initiating Force, even by Proxy or by
Delegation.  The only Result of your Vote is that some people have
their attention directed toward that candidate, and they just might
wonder what the fuss is about.  No Initiation of Force there.

When you vote for the lesser of two evils, you are voting AGAINST the
more evil candidate.  This does not apply to ordinary
Democratic/Republican choices, since both are Very Evil.  But often
there Is a candidate distinctly less Evil than the Top Two.  The
danger here is that he might win big, and will use your Vote as part
of what he calls a Mandate; so I agree that that might contribute to
Initiation of Force.  Judgment call.

As of now, I'm still pushing for Ron Paul.



Reply via email to