I have seen two other Genius Larken Rose articles that I wish had greater circulation... if you're in touch with him, ask if he minds your submitting them to TLE with Attribution to his name. If he says OK to this one, I'll send you the others I have in mind.
--- In LibertarianEnterprise@yahoogroups.com, "Dennis Lee Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I received this by email yesterday (July 4th) and thought it was > especially appropriate and maybe even suitable for TLE publication: > > Blind Nationalism > > Today is a day when millions of victims of a tyrannical regime go out > and proudly display their blind loyalty to that regime. The modern > celebrations which occur on July 4th make about as much sense as Jews > proudly parading around carrying banners of Swastikas. > > What, exactly, does the American flag represent? I don't mean what do > you WISH it represented--I mean, given how it is used and displayed > today, what must it ACTUALLY represent? Well, the nationalistic "pledge > of allegiance" says that the flag stands for a "Republic." In other > words, millions of children (not to mention adults) are trained to swear > allegiance to a FLAG and a GOVERNMENT. > > Ew. How revolting. > > A lot of people have told me they think I'm a "true patriot." I know > they mean it as a compliment, but I'm not sure why. What is it that I'm > being loyal to? It sure as heck isn't the government, or a piece of > cloth (the flag). In short, I'm loyal to the idea of FREEDOM--that every > individual rightfully owns himself, and that any infringement upon that > right (e.g., ALL "government") is an evil abomination. > > Now, some people like to imagine that that is what the U.S. of A. is > about: freedom. However, I don't see a shred of support for such a > claim. A couple hundred years ago you might have been able to make such > an argument, but what about today? Most of the country continues to vote > for one of two clubs of nationalist socialists, though they use the > meaningless names "Democratic" and "Republican." Neither club cares a > whit about freedom, inalienable rights, or even the flawed Constitution. > > So in what way can the U.S. be called pro-freedom? The tyrants in > Washington obviously aren't, nor are the sheep who elect them. In short, > if you care about freedom, waving the American flag now makes about as > much sense as waving the flag of the Soviet Union. Whatever you WISH it > represented, it is now in reality a symbol of tyranny, at home and > abroad. Do you really think the symbol that flies over all of the giant > monuments to power--the federal buildings--represents liberty anymore? > > If you love freedom, as I do, there is no country on earth for you. > Every flag, every nation, stands for your enslavement, in one way or > another. The megalomaniacs have their tentacles just about everywhere. > But what is more sickening than that is how the same people being > controlled, taxed, and regulated into economic and psychological ruin > will be out in force today, celebrating their purely imagined "freedom." > I, for one, can't stand the sight of it anymore, so don't expect to see > me at any parades or celebrations. Unlike 99.9% of this country, I see > no reason to celebrate my own enslavement. > > But have a Happy Dependence Day anyway. "If you're free and you know it, > clank your chains!" <clank, clank>... > > Sincerely, > > > Larken Rose > http://www.larkenrose.com <http://www.larkenrose.com/> > > > > > Larken Rose hails from Bryn Athyn, a borough of3000 inhabitants that > sports its very own Gothic cathedral, castle,French chateau, English > manor house, and schools system. In thisnational center of the > Swedenborgian religion, the children of freethinkers and New Agers go to > school with the kids of staunchconservatives, and battles are waged over > the killing of dandelions andwomen in the priesthood. > > > > > In a town that produces interesting people, Larken Rose catapultedabove > the rest by challenging the federal government to refute hisreading of > the tax code and answer his questions before he would givethem another > dime. In 2002, he produced a video explaining his researchand > conclusions. The video sold briskly for several years until > thegovernment railroaded the 37-year-old vocal upstart into > federalprison. His conclusions were never refuted; his questions > neveranswered. > > > > > Roseʼs interest in politics goes back to his youth. He was > alwayspassionately interested in the freedom of his fellow man, > movingintellectually from conservatism through libertarianism to > anarchism. How to be a Successful Tyrantis his first published work on > the dynamics of tyranny, written betweenhis conviction in federal court > and his surrender to prison, where heis busy writing his next book. > > > > > Before going to prison, Rose lived with his wife Tessa and > daughterElyssa in a modest home in Pennsylvania, where they count the > daysuntil he returns. >
