I think Bonneau's statement that children are bound by whatever agreements their parents happen to make, and that parents have the right to sell their children into lifelong slavery pretty much reveals what his mindset is. A parent is the steward of their child, not the owner, and as such, there are a large number of decisions they do not have the right to make on that child's behalf, any more than a banker I entrust with my money has the right to go and spend it all on beer, and refuse to compensate me.
His attempts to equate a tyrannical political system with a free one, because there are people who dislike either, is nonsense. The point of creating a free political system is much like creating a fair justice system, it is an attempt to create a system that is morally correct. In the case of a justice system, regardless of whether the judge finds for the plaintiff or the defendant, the other party is not going to like it. But the fact that some people may, at times, not like the results of a just court system is no excuse for creating an unjust one. Most people in civilized parts of the world recognize the value of a court system that punishes the guilty and frees the innocent, even if we dislike it at times. Unfortunately most people have yet to form the same objectivity when it comes to their political system. At any rate, when I go to whatever afterlife awaits me, I would much rather be judged as a 'libertine' than an enslaver of children. Bonneau claims to be a religious man, and based on his assertion that parents may do anything they like to their children, I am forming a rather strong opinion of who his particular god is. Google the term 'Moloch'.
