Each of the other quotes in that message are contained within a box, that last part is not.
However, for those interested in a more strongly worded (and even BETTER, IMHO) statement, I recommend Jim Davidson's Facebook notes and the 143 (and counting) comments at http://www.facebook.com/planetaryjim?ref=nf#!/note.php?note_id=281271853\ 044 <http://www.facebook.com/planetaryjim?ref=nf#%21/note.php?note_id=281271\ 853044> It would appear that Ron Paul shot himself in both his Republican feet. Dennis --- In LibertarianEnterprise@yahoogroups.com, "Inibo E. Exibo" <in...@...> wrote: > > Minor detail: that wasn't Molyneux. He didn't make it very clear, but > he was quoting someone else's web site. They giveaway was the "as a > former Ron Paul 2008 supporter" part. Stefan Molyneux was not a Ron > Paul 2008 supporter. In fact he was actively blogging and pod casting > against Ron Paul in particular and political action in general during > the campaign. Also, if you follow Molyneux at all you'll recognize that > the tone and language of that post was not his. At the risk of sounding > like a fan boy, Molyneux, for all his florid bombastic style, is > actually much more genteel than that. He rarely attacks individuals, > mostly limiting himself to refuting their ideas. Refuting them very > well IMO. > > Puck T. Smith > > Dennis Lee Wilson wrote: > > > > > > > > Ron Paul supports pro-war, pro-bailout candidate... > > > > Stefan Molyneux > > <http://freedomainradio.com/BOARD/members/admin/default.aspx> 's > > concluding statements > > > > http://freedomainradio.com/BOARD/forums/p/24121/187218.aspx > > <http://freedomainradio.com/BOARD/forums/p/24121/187218.aspx> > > > > As far as I'm concerned, as a former Ron Paul 2008 supporter, I'm done > > with Paul. I have denounced him publicly on Facebook because of his > > action, which is a straw (more like a hammer) that broke the camel's > > back. It's obvious that Paul is doing this for political expediency, at > > a cost of his past support from his devout pro-Liberty base. So much for > > his principled pro-Liberty political capital that he had been banking > > for well over a decade. > > > > After all the crap involving the old (not to mention > > "brush-under-the-rug") racist newsletter controversy > > <http://letlibertyring.blogspot.com/2009/07/if-ron-paul-didnt-write-them\ -who-really.html>, > > his decision to accept a donation of $500 from neo-Nazi Stormfront > > leader Don Black > > <http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/26/pageoneplus/corrections.html?_r=1> at > > one point during his 2008 presidential campaign, his anti-abortion and > > anti-illegal immigration > > <http://sheldonfreeassociation.blogspot.com/2007/12/ron-paul-on-meet-pre\ ss.html> > > records (which show that he's an anti-Liberty zealot on the said > > issues), his son Rand Paul's support for Gitmo > > <http://www.randpaul2010.com/2009/11/rand-paul-try-convict-and-lock-up-t\ errorists-in-guantanamo/>, > > and GOP senatorial candidate Peter Schiff's defense of the preemptive > > war doctrine <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73vVEY8zNCE> that had long > > since been established precedent by previous precedents by past > > presidential administrations (including George W. Bush's), I must wash > > my hands of Ron Paul and the groups that have long since been associated > > with him. For a man who takes this anti-Liberty stance in favor of being > > re-elected because it is just the price we pay for being involved in a > > dirty game called politics is retching and unconscionable. > > > > That also includes all and any organizations and groups that support and > > will continue to support Paul, including the Ludwig von Mises Institute > > <http://www.mises.org/>, Campaign for Liberty, LewRockwell.com > > <http://www.lewrockwell.com/>, the LRC Blog > > <http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog>, the Daily Paul > > <http://www.dailypaul.com/>, etc. > > > > I wonder what Paul's friend Rockwell will say about this latest fall-out > > (not to mention how he'll say it). How is he going to spin this mess in > > Ron's favor? Furthermore, how's he going to defend Paul? If he, Ron, and > > Paul's ardent defenders are worried about the media fallout over this > > revelation and the egg on face that will be splattered all over Ron, his > > congressional campaign, and his entire support base, then perhaps he > > should have thought about that before he made a vile pact with the > > political Devil by aligning himself with a congressman who's not even > > remotely like him. > > > > Enough of this vulgar libertarianism! Down with the state! It's time to > > work outside the political system. Forget the political beast; it can't > > be "saved" or "reformed." It's time to throw the baby out with the bath > > water. And that's especially because the baby happens to be Rosemary's > > Baby > > <http://www.amazon.com/Rosemarys-Baby-Mia-Farrow/dp/B00003CXCF/ref=sr_1_\ 1?ie=UTF8&s=dvd&qid=1263636055&sr=8-1>. > > > > > > >
