On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 01:00:13PM +0200, SF Markus Elfring <elfr...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > >> 2. Would it eventually need to be protected by a mutex (from the > >> multi-threading perspective)? > > > > Using a mutex in a signal handler is neither conforming nor working in > > practise, so far worse than the current approach. > > I find it interesting that the statements "ECB_MEMORY_FENCE_ACQUIRE" and > "ECB_MEMORY_FENCE_RELEASE" were added recently.
And whats the connection to mutexes and signal handlers here? Your mails to this list seem to become less and less sane - if you want to contribute or discuss something, that's fine, but your mails seem to be nothing more than random statements without meaning or relevance to libev. I would urge you to change course into more productive directions because frankly, I do not have time for this. -- The choice of a Deliantra, the free code+content MORPG -----==- _GNU_ http://www.deliantra.net ----==-- _ generation ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / schm...@schmorp.de -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ _______________________________________________ libev mailing list libev@lists.schmorp.de http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libev