On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 01:48:41PM +0800, "Dennis Lan (dlan)" <dennis.y...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Note that fedora plans to rmeove the pkg-config file because it doesn't > > really improve anything (and they have an ethical upstream policy). > > > > also where do you get this info?
>From the new libev package maintainer who has to deal with the situation. > I checked libverto (which rely on libev), they still use pkg-config .. That makes libverto a fedora-only library, requiring a special fedora-patched libev to compile, and its not trivial to undo this. I can't say why they did that - probably they did that just because they assumed the fedora-packaged libev version would be the original upstream version. Now if that isn't the perfect argument on why including this patch in gentoo is just wrong... > yes, you may say that's the problem of libverto.. but you know you can help > here ;-) Yes, I can help here, by keeping it out of libev until there is a demonstrated usefulness to it. I wish there *was* a mechanism that was able to automatically give the correct cflags and libs, but pkg-config does nothing of the sort - it just gives you cflags and libs that are most likely not necessary, and quite often wrong. -- The choice of a Deliantra, the free code+content MORPG -----==- _GNU_ http://www.deliantra.net ----==-- _ generation ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / schm...@schmorp.de -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ _______________________________________________ libev mailing list libev@lists.schmorp.de http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libev