Hmm. Nathan, did you check against CVS? Niels.
On 3/26/06, Nathan Binkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have some related issues. In addition to freeing a base, I want to be > able to create a base without setting current_base. (I have a library > that uses libevent, and I don't want to assume anything about how someone > uses libevent.) Unfortunately, if I do this, and create something like > event_base_init() to create an event base, but nobody ever calls > event_init(), event_set() will fail because it sets a default priority > based on current_base. I'd like to create a version of event_set that > takes the desired base, but event_base_set is already taken as a name. > > Any opinions on this? Does anyone actually use the current version of > event_base_set? It doesn't seem very useful to me. I assume that the > current version will have to stay though. Anyone have any desire to > propose another name? Similarly, event_once will need to have something > similar. Any opinions on this stuff? > > Nathan > _______________________________________________ > Libevent-users mailing list > Libevent-users@monkey.org > http://monkey.org/mailman/listinfo/libevent-users > > _______________________________________________ Libevent-users mailing list Libevent-users@monkey.org http://monkey.org/mailman/listinfo/libevent-users
