Hmm. I thought that there was an event_base_init now? I guess I did
not commit that yet.
I had talked to you about event_base_init() and I even factored it out,
but the problem is that that alone is not that useful because event_set
doesn't work with it because of the way it is written. That's the problem
I am trying to solve. I just wanted to know what you wanted it to look
like. Should I make event_set not grab the default priority from
current_base? Should we make event_base_set more like the other
event_base_foo functions in that it takes all the same parameters, but
also takes a base? Should we create another function alltogether? (I
worry about that because of name confusion.)
Nathan
_______________________________________________
Libevent-users mailing list
Libevent-users@monkey.org
http://monkey.org/mailman/listinfo/libevent-users
