Uwe Bonnes wrote: >> Wouldn't be the 1.0 release be a good point where we should make ftdi_context >> opaque to the users, disallow all direct access and force the user to do >> ftdi_new() ?
Maybe, but there were some members that do not currently have functions available to modify them. At least in 0.1. Such as usb_read_timeout and usb_write_timeout. If you make it opaque, be prepared to add accessors/modifiers (or whatever jargon is used in C). Michael -- libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details. To unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
