On Friday, September 03, 2010 11:00:12 Thomas Jarosch wrote: > On Thursday, 2. September 2010 19:10:11 you wrote: > > > I'm sure Gentoo provides cmake, right? > > > > i understand your desire to not have to maintain autoconf. but i > > certainly can take care of that aspect and just send patches when > > necessary. you could even have a dummy configure/Makefile that output > > "use cmake now" and for people who want autotools, they'll get > > overwritten when generating things. > > What about the other way round? Some people add new features > to libftdi and only provide autoconf support.
tell them "sorry, post a patch for cmake" -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
