On 22/10/14 10:51, E.S. Rosenberg wrote: > Doesn't that mean that an interface users are using changed? I don't think so. The rs232_inversion options were never (to my knowledge and based on a few simple tests) processed by ftdi_eeprom. Both, invert and rs232_inversion, seem to write to the same memory location, so I thought merging them together might be a suitable option.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
