Hi Florian, On Thursday, 23. October 2014 08:42:31 Florian Preinstorfer wrote: > > you are right, eeprom->rs232_inversion is the same as eeprom->invert. > > To replacing it is good. However i propose to split up yout patch in two > > parts: > > - first replacing rs232_inversio vs. invert. > > - second introducing the printout function. > > > > This will help regression testing. > > Hi Uwe. > > Good point, thanks for reviewing the patch. Please find two patches > attached, that split up the rs232_inversion replacement and the printout > function.
thanks for splitting the patch and also Uwe for the review. I'll take a look at them soonish. [My planning got messed up again: First two shell shock updates and now an SSLv3 poodle ;) You can't really plan for security issues / upgrades.] Cheers, Thomas -- libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details. To unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
