On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 12:14:40PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 04:01:39PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > > Maybe you should use one nbd disk, which has the closest code path > > with nbdublk. > > Good idea - I have started a heavy test using nbd.ko as the > backing. Let's see what happens after 12 hours or more.
xfstests(./check) is done. - v6.0-rc3+ (commit dcf8e5633e2) - nbdublk/nbd is test device, virtio-scsi is scratch device - both nbdublk and nbd survive, and result is same too: Failures: generic/471 generic/633 generic/644 generic/645 xfs/019 xfs/049 xfs/082 xfs/144 xfs/191 xfs/199 xfs/543 xfs/544 xfs/545 xfs/549 Failed 14 of 1069 tests Thanks, Ming _______________________________________________ Libguestfs mailing list Libguestfs@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs
